‘Amy Covid Barrett’ Trends as Left Goes ‘Absolutely Crazy’ Over 5-4 SCOTUS Ruling on Religious Gatherings

Loading ....


“Almost” as enjoyable as the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision to block New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s order limiting the size of religious gatherings — ostensibly to fight against the spread of COVID — has been watching the predictable apoplectic meltdown on the Left.

Moreover, the enjoyment is made extra special by knowing that they know SCOTUS might well not have even taken up the case — just as it refused to do in two similar cases earlier this year — if Amy Coney Barrett were not on the Court to cast the tie-breaker.

And best of all is knowing that the Democrat Party and its dancing monkeys in the liberal media know damn well Wednesday’s SCOTUS decision was a harbinger of things to come.

That knowledge is twofold.

First, Barrett’s confirmation solidified a conservative majority on the Court, made even more important on Wednesday when Chief Justice John Roberts once again showed his true colors by sidling up alongside the three liberal justices and casting with their lot.

Second, the knowledge that regardless of the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, Donald Trump’s legacy is not only secured; it was manifested on Wednesday evening.

Let the hyperbolic histrionics begin!

Within moments of news of the SCOTUS ruling breaking, Leftists cranked up their normal level of hysteria level to full-blast crazy-train, as “Amy Covid Barrett” began to trend on social media. As reported by our friends at Twitchy, smug blue-checkmark Twitter losers led the clown par parade out of the gate.

Singer Deren Ney was just one many to play the “Amy Covid Barrett” card, no doubt thinking it was clever.

Screenwriter Randi Mayem Singer vowed to call ACB “Amy Covid Barret” for the rest of her life; as if the Hollywood lefty wouldn’t come up with an even “better” nickname for Barrett, sooner or later.

Author Ali A. Rizvi went with a silly “death” tweet.(Pay no attention to Laurence Tribe’s drivel in the tweet; he was lying and he knew it.)

This lunatic “creator of animation” didn’t know whether to laugh about the silly nickname or weep about the “thousands and thousands” of sure death that ACB has “just handed us.


Elsewhere, The Most Trust Name in News™ trotted out a doctor to slam the ruling as an “absolutely crazy” decision that “devalues human lives.” Dr. Peter Hotez said, after being cued up by CNN fill-in host Boris Sanchez:

“Yeah, it’s absolutely crazy. This is not about religious freedom; this is not about civil liberties; this is about all hands on deck to save lives over the next few months until we get everybody vaccinated. […] I can say with firmness and clarity that human life is not cheap. And that Supreme Court ruling did just that — it devalues human lives and makes it really tough for our health care providers to provide the best care possible to lower mortality rates.”

Sanchez “forgot” to ask Sanchez if he although thought months of “peaceful protests” devalued human lives.

See also  Actress Patricia Arquette Goes After Trump For Iran in Golden Globes Speech

Former Obama stooge Ben Rhodes — Rhodes is still a stooge; he just doesn’t work for Chicago Jesus Barrack Obama, anymore — busted out the I-word — “illegitimate” — the Left’s favorite word over the last four years.

Makes perfect “sense,” right? Illegitimate president begets illegitimate Supreme Court Justice begets illegitimate Supreme Court decision.

Even the “victim” of the SCOTUS ruling himself lashed out at the Court’s decision; then again, noted “Leadership” expert extraordinaire NY Gov. Andrew Cuomo always lashes out at those who right his wrongs.

“We know who he appointed to the Court and we know their ideology,” Cuomo said calling the decision “irrelevant” and “moot.”

“The Supreme Court made a ruling. It’s more illustrative of the Supreme Court than anything else.

“It’s irrelevant of any practical impact because of the zone they were talking about is moot. It expired last week,” the governor said, adding, “It doesn’t have any practical effect.

“The lawsuit was about the Brooklyn zone. The Brooklyn zone no longer exists as a red zone. That’s mooted. So that restriction is no longer in effect. That situation just doesn’t exist because those restrictions are gone.”

“Practical impact” aside, Cuomo was lying. Lying in the sense that he knows full well that the SCOTUS ruling establishes precedent, and that the next time he gets a wild hair up his thinks about going all Andrew Cuomo with a similar edict he might think twice before doing so.

The bottom line:

See also  The GOP, the House in 2020 and Playing to Win, Part 1: The Offense

First, victory for the First Amendment and religious liberty in the U.S Supreme Court. Then, the enjoyable knowledge that the Left not only lost its collective crap over this decision; but that it also knows the decision was a harbinger of things to come — made possible by a solidified conservative majority on Court.

And best of all, Donald Trump “did that.” (That was for you, Chicago Jesus Barack Obama.) And the Democrat cannot undo it.



  • A simple, step-by-step guide to maximize your anthurium plant's health and flowers.
  • Ads by MyCBGenie 
    0 0 votes
    Article Rating
    Notify of

    9  +  1  =  

    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments