DNI Ratcliffe Confirms There Was Foreign Election Interference, Including by China

0
35
Loading ....

[ad_1]

We reported earlier today on how the intel report about foreign election interference was being delayed because apparently there was an internal battle over what to put in it.

From Fox News:

“This afternoon the DNI was notified by career intelligence officials that the Intelligence Community will not meet the December 18 deadline, set by Executive Order and Congress, to submit the IC’s classified assessment on foreign threats to the 2020 U.S. elections,” Amanda Schoch, Assistant DNI for Strategic Communications said in a statement to Fox News…

…Sources told Fox News that a number of senior intelligence analysts are “adamant” that China sought to influence the 2020 presidential election, while a number of others are downplaying China’s activities surrounding the election.

So why are these intelligence officials trying to slow walk the truth? What don’t they want to get out there and why are they delaying it? Are folks trying to delay it until it’s too late to make a difference? Or are they trying not to let things out that support that there were real issues in the election?

Despite this failure to turn over the information on time, CBS’s Catherine Herridge reported what she had been told by the Director of National Intelligence, John Ratcliffe.

Ratcliffe apparently wants the information out there no matter what the stalling from the intel folks.

READ  New NeverTrump PAC Seems to Complete the Evolution of NeverTrump Into Just Another Grift

Herridge reported on how Ratcliffe leads the 17 intelligence agencies and has access to the most highly classified information held by the U.S. government. He told Herridge that there was foreign interference by China, Iran and Russia in November around the election and he is anticipating that report to be released now in January.

What that all encompasses is not clear. We know that there was likely information interference with Chinese bots and other such things, but the question is if there was further interference that could have had any effect on the election. It’s also pretty clear who China, Iran and Russia would prefer to win. Hint: It wasn’t Trump. If there’s more and DNI Ratcliffe has it, that’s a pretty big bombshell for folks to be sitting on.



[ad_2]

 


RELATED PRODUCTS
Ads by MyCBGenie 
 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here